In The Dreamcatcher by Stephen King, there is a scene where aliens, disguised as humans, go into a convenience store to get something to eat. They’re trying really hard to fool the real humans, so they ponder what humans like to eat.
This is a general blog for readers and writers.
In The Dreamcatcher by Stephen King, there is a scene where aliens, disguised as humans, go into a convenience store to get something to eat. They’re trying really hard to fool the real humans, so they ponder what humans like to eat.
This quote came up on my Facebook feed today and set me on a rant:
The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion, but allow very lively debate within that spectrum. That gives people the sense that there's free thinking going on, while all the time the presuppositions of the system are being reinforced by the limits put on the range of the debate. ~Noam Chomsky
So, I thought, what would I see if I step away from the minutiae? By minutiae I’m referring to some friggin big things, like women’s healthcare, LGBTQ+ issues, Jan6, the upcoming election, all of it, all of the things being pointed and counterpointed in the news every day. Referencing the above quote, are all of these things examples of ways the spectrum of acceptable opinion has been strictly limited?
I’ve been embroiled in my nation’s politics since the 2020 election. So much is at stake. So many moving parts. But are there? What would I see if I could beam myself up to a satellite station and look down on all of this from a distance? Is there a pattern to this chaos?
I see that we have a mission to save democracy in the United States of America. It hit me that democracy will not be saved by a super hero in tights and a cape. Democracy will be saved by we the people working together to bring light and shine it all of those dark corners. Our theme song should be This Little Light of Mine.
I get the sense that all of these weighty, important issues at hand are distracting us from the real issue. All of these matters, every single one, stems from Donald Trump. Throw in his puppetry over the Republican Party in Congress, and it is evident that he has taken over control of us all. He’s stirred so many pots, and we’re all in those pots, spinning.
If we’re, all of us, the collective hero, we’re really only up against one man. All of those angry voices out there, they’re all really him shouting, disrespecting, demeaning. Trump made that normal. He made it acceptable. He made millions of Americans extensions of his bullhorn. So, what needs to happen is for that bullhorn to be taken away. If he were to be silenced, lots of people would snap out of it, until only a few diehard fanatics would be occasionally seen.
The only way to silence him is to treat him like any other criminal. Could you imagine being arrested for armed robbery, but being released by the court because you don’t have time to go to jail. You’re up for a promotion. Treat him like the criminal that he is, and throw him in the pokey…without bail. That’s what he deserves, and that’s what we deserve. Treat him like any other prisoner. Fuck his secret service detail. He lost his status as a free American when he was charged.
Putting him in prison would castrate their strategy of delay. How fast would they go from tortoise to hare if he couldn’t campaign from prison? Then we’d have a trial. And he will be found guilty. And he will go to prison for the rest of his whiney little life.
And his goon squad…all of those who’ve been manipulated and hypnotized by his seething hate…we will see, won’t we, what they’re made of. I think that Jan6 was a wake up call for his base. Until that day, they never dreamed that there could be consequences for anything that they did in Trump’s name. Somewhere in their deluded minds, they know that Trump calling the convicted insurrectionists hostages changes nothing. The institution of our court system looms over them. Trump can say anything he wants, and they can cheer for it all, but now they will hit a wall if summoned to go to battle for him ever again.
So, instead, his cultists shrink into their lairs and seek out Trump’s targets to threaten, demean, terrorize on his behalf. And as they sneer with pride when they send this hatefulness to another human being, they must certainly know on some level that they’ve descended into complete cowardice.
Take away his bullhorn. Throw him in the clink. Put him in a cell by himself so that he can’t hurt anyone. We’re wasting time. The courts need to stop coddling this grifting, self-aggrandizing, hateful, manipulative man. Every day he stays out of jail, he’s winning. They say that there is no such thing as bad publicity. All of the news is about him. There isn’t a shred of anything going on where we don’t have his stupid input. Whether part of his base or not, left, right, any label you want, the news is about him. He’s in control, and it needs to stop.
In computer parlance, it’s called an infinite loop. An infinite loop goes like this:
If blah is true
Do blabbity blah
Sleep 20
Done
As long as the blah remains true, the program will repeat the blabbity blah command every 20 seconds…forever, until you hit CTRL+C to manually exit.
I have an infinite loop in my head, and it holds me in a paralytic twilight as it plays and plays and plays. My biggest challenge is to find a way to hit CTRL+C. The loop resides in a deep groove inside my head, so finding the exit keys is difficult.
I retired this year, so the loop presents an array of conditions related to that adjustment:
Retirement is a challenge in all kinds of ways I never anticipated. Fear of the future has encased my life in a putrid fog of self-doubt. Sometimes, the fog lifts, and a radiant blue sky buoys me up just enough to see outside of the groove.
Extra light draws me and I am able to step out, or as John Muir would say, step in. Only outside of the loop can I access my creative self. I jump on it. I write. I design and execute many pieces of jewelry. I read a ton of books. I attend to life’s business, clear away wreckage. Eventually, I’ll get too close to the edge and fall back into the groove, where the loop waits.
The loop is a trickster, not intending good or bad, simply performing it’s imperative. It never stops, even when I am outside of the groove. I’ve never been able to find the CTRL+C. So, until I do, my job is to get out of earshot. Slip out the back, Jack. Make a new plan, Stan…
Such is the rhythm of my life. The rhythm holds a stark reality. I cannot immerse myself in any creative endeavor if any part of me is thinking about how I will make money from it. Thinking along those lines is the surest way to make the creativity fairy bid me a fond fuck you. What I want her to do, wish I could train her to do, is scream, “Stay away from that groove, you fool!” And call me back into her bosom.
Today I finished reading Steven King’s Finder’s Keepers. One of the things I underlined in my Kindle was when Pete says that Rothstein’s work changed his heart. I immediately thought of the book that had the biggest impact on me when I was a young reader, The Once and Future King, by T H White. The book didn’t change my heart, rather, it articulated truths about my core being that opened my heart and showed it to me.
The book made me laugh until I was in pain. And it made me cry for days. I could say so many things.
The Once and Future King, a World War II anti-war novel, is a compilation of five books.
The Sword and the Stone
The Ill Made Knight
The Queen of Air and Darkness
Candle in the Wind
The Book of Merlyn
The books were originally published in the late 1940s. The Book of Merlyn wasn’t published until the late 1970s. When The Book of Merlyn came out, I couldn’t believe it! There was MORE!
I’ve always thought that, if I were to be given one wish, I would wish that I could flip a switch that would allow me to read a book, see a movie, hear a piece of music for the first time again. I’ve read many books more than once, but I can never read them again for the first time. That’s what I want. I want to read a book for the first time the second time I read it…and the third. Maybe that’s not such a good thing. If I could do that, I might only read one book, thus denying myself the pleasure of so many wonderful storytellers.
I digressed. I squealed in the bookstore the day The Book of Merlyn came out. But, after reading it, I had a sense that something was wrong. The Book of Merlyn tells the story of Merlyn changing Arthur into animals so that he can learn the different ways creatures of the earth govern their societies. But some of the stories in the Book of Merlyn had already been told at the beginning, in The Sword and the Stone.
I discovered that parts of the work had been edited out because they were considered too controversial. So, when the greater work, The Once and Future King, was published in a single volume, The Book of Merlyn was removed. Some of the endearing animal stories from The Book of Merlyn were placed in The Sword and The Stone. And parts of the Sword and the Stone were removed, altogether.
I pieced this together in a T H White meandering. In the 1980s, when I was a poor college student, I walked past a collector’s bookstore on my way to the bus. Of course, I went in. Often. One day, I found a first edition of The Sword and the Stone. It still had the flawless original jacket. I think I got tears in my eyes and paid something like $12.00 for it. I know we’re supposed to put such treasures in glass-encased bookshelves, to be admired but not touched beyond a mild dusting. But the book vibrated in my hands, begging to be read. The book is dogeared now, but it’s still my treasure. Cringe if you must.
That’s where I discovered Madame Mimm! And the snake story appears in the original version, that same snake who has such an important role in the final chapters. So, once again, I had discovered MORE!
Since then, I have found separate publications of each of the collected works, mostly in libraries. Each one is worth a separate read. Each was edited for compilation in The Once and Future King.
White creates characters who spin their own stories, some so comical that I smile just thinking of them, some hapless but never passive, and some profoundly dark. He throws in little delightful bits, like Arthur speaking with a boy named Tom of Warwick. I didn’t pick up on it when I read The Once and Future King the first time. But I caught it in the musical version of Camelot, at the end, Richard Harris as Arthur, speaking to Tom of Warwick, sending him home to tell the tale of Camelot. Where once it never rained ‘til after sundown…sorry. Sir Thomas Malory was from Warwickshire.
The stories of Arthur came from all over, but the first writer that I know of to compile the stories of Arthur was Sir Thomas Malory in the 1200s. Malory wrote parts of Le Morte d’Arthur from prison. It was while I was reading Malory that a friend said to me, “If you like that, you have to read The Once and Future King.” I thoroughly enjoyed Malory. But I read a prose version of it by Keith Baines. Very readable. I love the battle scenes. They’re hysterically funny. A knight can be gashed from groin to sternum, steaming guts spilling to the ground, and he’ll pick them up, stuff them back into his belly, wrap himself up and return to battle.
Malory also included Tristram stories, which are a hoot. That guy was a total man-whore, who used the excuse, sorry, honey, I thought she was you. My favorite Tristram story is the one when he rescues one of the Elaines, I can’t remember which one, and Tristram wouldn’t know either. Elaine is being publicly boiled in a cauldron of oil for some transgression. Tristram pulls her naked, pink body from the boiling cauldron, saving her life and causing her to fall madly in love with him. When I say madly, I mean it. The lady turns out to be quite coocoo in later stories. But, after the oil incident, she was reportedly pink for days.
Most college students have been assigned the story of Sir Gawain and the Green Knight. I’ve found so many stories like that in second hand bookstores, and they’re like little pieces of candy.
Next that I know of is Tennison’s epic poem, Mort d’Arthur. Tennison’s work best told the story of The Lady of Shalot, which has been rendered beautifully in music and painting. I have a poster of the Waterhouse painting in my dining area.
White came along in the 1940s. Steinbeck wrote a compilation of some of the Arthurian stories. Mark Twain wrote humorous story of a time traveler, who goes back to Arthur’s time, A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur’s Court.
Mary Stewart wrote a popular trilogy, centering around Merlyn.
The Mists of Avalon is a title that comes up when discussing books about Arthur.
I can’t think of any other prominent works about Arthur. These are just the things I’ve read. I suppose I could go back to before Malory. The further back I go, the closer I will get to writings made when the nitty gritty of the stories can be laid bare.
The stories depict a time in England when Roman Christians were in the process of stamping out paganism and replacing it with Christianity. The world is populated by witches, who are evil, whose ways must be vilified and annihilated. The greatest quest of the round table is to find the holy grail. Knights gain strength from their purity, each sin diminishes them. Only Galahad, who is without sin, is able to see the grail. If I go back to before Malory, will I find writings made when people believed these things? When pagan England was under siege of Roman ideology? When rituals focusing on the lyrical processes of Nature were going underground, to be replaced by a system whose god had martyred his own son. In place of herbal remedies and midwives, stone edifices were erected to house stories with a focus on white men, their deeds, their battles, their destruction. To find stories written during those times would be a prize.
Retirement. How old was I when I started to think about it? How many years into my career? Early on, I had great imaginings about what it would be like. “I’ll travel the world!” I thought, unraveling a mental montage. Standing in front of St. Mark’s in Venice. Strolling a dusty open market in India. Playing on the beaches of Cambodia. Revisiting The Tate, MOMA, Palazzo Borgese. Walking the Camino de Santiago…at least part of it.
I’d get in shape, take myself out into the woods for local hikes at least once a week. I’d walk. Join a gym with a pool. Oh, I’d be so busy taking care of myself. Each day a new adventure.
But the moon has two sides. The dark side of the moon returned echoes from an endless cavern. Will I have enough? Will I be able to keep my house? Will I be healthy? Will I be alone? Will I die within a year or so like my dad? I’ve always thought that the health problem that took him was a symptom of a man who was just so tired of it all. Would I be like that when I retire? Tired of it all?
Those were good questions. But there are others I’ve identified now that I’m about 9 months into retirement. For example, I had not anticipated what an emotional roller coaster it would be.
With the 401k, I went from:
Never touch it unless it’s an emergency. New water heater. New car. A medical expense. Emergency dental treatment. Leave it for that purpose alone. Don’t touch it unless you have to.
To:
If I pay myself X a month, the 401k funds will last for X years. That will give me just enough breathing room to cover my expenses, if I’m careful. And, surely, my business will begin to kick in a little.
It’s taken nine months, but I’m finally quasi-comfortable with the financial side of things. I’m going to be okay. I have adequately provided for myself. I just can’t live like I was when I was bringing in a couple of paychecks every month, each having been more than my one monthly Social Security allotment.
Dealing with Social Security and Medicare intimidates me. They are both, at once, extremely efficient and inefficient at the same time. When they do something wrong, it takes hours of maneuvering around the bureaucracy to speak to someone who can address the problem. Their rules seem random and incomprehensible.
The details are boring and typical big bureaucracy balderdash. But I realize now that I haven’t dealt with this kind of bureaucracy since I was in college. Maybe that’s another thing college taught me. How to go with the flow of a nasty, rule-ridden, system.
My memories of the University bureaucracy are of a place where each person behind a desk only holds his one piece of the puzzle. No one within the bureaucracy can see the whole machine. So, rather than turning its gears, the student is the one spinning, spinning, gone. It takes fortitude, courage and a little bit of being the one who goes where angels fear to tread.
Thank god that isn’t the whole of it. Making jewelry has become a passion. I do bead work inside the house and silver and copper work out in the shop… or the Nan Cave, as I like to think of it.
Yes. I am alone. But I’ve settled into my aloneness to a place where I am never lonely. I enjoy my solitude. I frequently go into a creative zone, where I have so many things to turn to. Writing. Just sitting and reading a book. Working on a challenging bead project. Going out to the shop and losing myself in the tools and materials I’ve put together. Sometimes I come out of the zone to realize that it’s after 9PM, darkness dropped on top of me, and I’m famished. I enjoy long, hot bubble baths and time with my kitties. I love cooking myself interesting meals. I’m never bored and am surprised to find that I am usually quite happy.
A few months ago, I started selling stuff on eBay. I buy stuff from garage sales and thrift stores. Then resell it. I’m still getting the hang of it. I buy figurines, vases, trinket dishes. I look for things that make me wonder why someone left this object behind. I’ve found some wonderful stuff. I haven’t made much money yet. I’ve sold a few items, and it always surprises me to see what sells. But I have a lot to learn about how the world of online retail can serve me. In the meantime, it’s great fun. I’ve become a prowler of thrift stores. I have a pile of stuff acquired but not yet sold, and I refuse to believe that I may be becoming a hoarder. I will NOT become a hoarder. NOT. So, I enjoy some of these things for a while. Then I let them go.
So, I have a couple of activities that fulfill two purposes. These activities are designed to be fun and to bring in a little bit of money. And, between these two activities, jewelry making and eBay haunting, I am quite busy.
My social life has gotten a little busier, too. I’m such a recluse. I resist anything that gets me around people. But I recognize that I must get out of here a few times a week to be around other people. I go to one of my two favorite restaurants, places where everyone knows me, where I don’t need to see the menu. Even when there is little conversation, I feel comforted being in these familiar public places.
I’ve also done a couple of craft fairs. Those have been really fun and get me out and around lots of people. Craft fairs are so good for me.
Immediately after I retired, I went to that familiar panicky survival mode. How does one not work? In the past, I’ve had a lot of lean times when I was between jobs. Finding a new job was a horror show of putting myself out there, investigating what came back. Singing back to middle-managers my enthusiasm for being part of a team, solving problems, elevating the structure, when inside feeling like garbage, feeling hopeless, being so full of fear that nothing would come along until it was too late. When I retired, that’s where I went and stayed for about 2 months.
Then it slowly dawned on me that this was not the same situation I’d been in many times before. No. Retirement was something entirely different, and the plunge into survival mode fear and despair was not warranted here. If I wasn’t careful, I might start having thoughts about being tired of it all. I backed myself out of that groove and started off in a new direction. And I’m so glad I did, because this road is beautiful and full of surprises.
I attended a seminar last weekend in my small town of Monroe, Washington, which had the purpose of finding ways to make our community more inclusive. It’s mighty white here in Monroe…but not really. We have a large Hispanic population and a small black population, a smattering of Muslims, a growing group from India and an occasional Asian. But our community events do not include people who aren’t white. It’s not intentional. But all of the events are planned by white people. So, music in the park centers around bands that appeal to old white men. No one’s going to suggest that we have a dance in the park that plays nothing but songs from James Baldwin’s Spotify list.
Now, I know that there is racism in this town. Politically, we’re divided, like everywhere else. Like everywhere else, the hate faction that has sprung from right-wing politics goes about carrying a bullhorn. I know that racism exists, that my brothers and sisters who are not white face dangers and challenges that I can only try to imagine. I know that I go about my life from a place of privilege, without even seeing how privilege manifests itself in my life. I am not blissful in my ignorance, though. I want to know, to understand what’s actually happening.
So, this seminar focused on how to build a more inclusive community. Then, one of the facilitators said something that hit me between the eyes. She said that the two black women in our community who normally would have co-facilitated this event were not there because they are too afraid to come to the YMCA building. This seminar, by definition, should have been safe. The YMCA should be a safe place. Yet they were too afraid to come and be with us.
I commented on this. I said that I wanted a better understanding of what these women were dealing with. Why would they feel unsafe in a room full of women (and one man) who had gathered with the express purpose of fostering inclusion. The white facilitator told me that she would be happy to take me aside, maybe for coffee, and explain it to me. But, she said that by even talking with them, I would further victimize them. By talking to them, I would become a perpetrator of their oppression.
I don’t know what to do with that. If my community is that toxic, and I’m not saying it isn’t, what the hell good would it do to have an Hispanic band at a community gathering? If attending a meeting with the purpose of discussing inclusion is not safe, if entering the YMCA, which publishes its core values as caring, respect, honesty, responsibility, and inclusiveness, is not safe, then why would anyone think that encouraging more ethnic vendors to set up in our farmer’s market is a solution?
I’ve heard many time that it is not any black person’s job to explain it to me. Indeed, the facilitator pointed out to me my ignorance in this regard, that by even speaking to these women who felt too traumatized to attend this meeting, I would further their battering.
I don’t know…maybe I am incredibly ignorant, but I think that, before throwing a party for people who don’t trust me, it might be a good idea for us to sit together and get to know one another better. It might be a good idea to ask our non-white neighbors what they would like. It’s like we’re changing the menu to appeal to people who would never come to our restaurant, for people whose refined palates we haven’t bothered to become familiar. It’s all well intentioned. But, as white people, is it our place to decide what would make them feel more included? If getting to know them better is considered abuse, then I’m at a loss. That’s where I get stuck.
So, I turn to the teachers who have spoken out. Again, I turn to books, movies and art. But I don’t understand how I can help effect change if I have to cross the street to avoid sharing the sidewalk with someone who finds me a threat because of my color. I came across this clip of James Baldwin this morning.
During her talk on Tuesday, Heather Cox-Richardson posed the question: why are these people going through such gyrations to support an ex-president? I also wonder this…it can’t be just because they don’t want to lose Trump’s base. That base just isn’t big enough, IMO, to warrant the amount of energy they are putting into keeping themselves tethered to poor Mr. Trump. Is it? I mean, really. What if they all just said screw it…screw him? What if they all openly proclaimed that Trump is not their horse anymore? What if they all stopped tearing down and began working to build us up? What’s stopping them?
Heather said that she feels like she's missing something. Well, me too. At the risk of sounding like a left-wing conspiracy theorist or just a batty old woman, I keep turning to Russia.
I am convinced that Russian interference put Trump in the White House in 2016. I just can’t believe that so many Americans were manipulated into voting for him to give him such a sweeping victory. To believe that his win was legitimate would mean that I would have to realize that this is NOT my country, that the majority of the people here are some combination of stupid, hateful and violent.
Then in 2019, Mitch McConnell was nicknamed Moscow Mitch when he blocked two House-approved measures to protect elections, despite warnings that Russia intended to meddle in the 2020 race. This was also about the time when the clown car of MAGA goons started really pumping up the volume.
The actions of Congress members in this group are so anti-American and so autocratic-leaning I can’t come to any other conclusion than to believe that Russia has infiltrated at least 2 branches of our federal government.
When Trump was just entering the stage, Putin must have been ecstatic. What a perfect stooge to further his efforts to topple us. All Putin had to do to control the guy was to flatter him. So, Russia lost control of the Executive Branch in 2020, but, with the help of our Congress and a few Supreme Court Justices, it could continue to hammer away at us until we break.
Well, we’re not going to break. Pundits keep talking as though Trump could actually win in 2024. I cannot allow myself to believe that. We simply cannot allow it.
He looks at the camera with contempt and arrogance. Pundits are saying he spent hours rehearsing for that photo for his mug shot. He wanted to get the image just right. The image needed to be perfect to be transformed into an effective tool for fund raising. So, they’re saying that the picture was calculated, formed with practiced nuance. He’d only get one shot. Had to get it right.
Contempt and arrogance. Rehearsed. I can see his base using that image to elevate him, to demonstrate proof that he is a super hero. But I see something different. I don’t think it was rehearsed. I’m not saying that he didn’t rehearse how he wanted to look in his mug shot. I completely believe that he did this. But this photo was not what was rehearsed. In this photo, I see a man without a mask. This is what is underneath the jaunty, self-aggrandizing, smug banter that we usually see. Here is the menace behind the mask. His contempt for all is palpable.
Meadows and Giuliani also have the same expression on their faces. White male privilege. Rage that anyone could dare to treat them with anything but delicate deference because of who they are. Contempt. Arrogance.
Here’s what I like to think. I like to think that the Fulton County processing procedures really were performed for these puffed up sleaze bags the same as for everyone else. No nonsense. They were given orders, and it was made clear that, if they did not immediately comply, harsher measures would be used. Imagine being treated that way when you see yourself as being so important that you are above such treatment. When I imagine these men, having been among the most powerful people in the world, now standing under florescent lights, being told what to do by a civil servant, being stripped of their freedom in the same procedure rooms where countless criminals of all kinds had been processed in the same manner, it takes my breath away. Those mug shots were not rehearsed. By the time they came before the camera, their rage had burned away their carefully maintained masks. Their privilege had been cast aside by these lowly civil servants, and what had been carefully stoked and hidden on the inside flared out, allowing us all to see that they are nothing more than malignant scabs, clinging to the still living tissue of our democracy. These men still attempt to spread their malignancy and devour that living tissue until they transform it into something dead and lifeless.
And that’s a cause for hope because our democracy still lives. These roiling spit balls are not going to win. They may be seething with contempt and arrogance as they glare at the camera, but they are arrested. Their freedom has been taken away, and they are now under the control of the State of Georgia. Wow. What a satisfying feeling.
The first doll I remember loving was Raggedy BoomBoom. Raggedy BoomBoom was not the traditional Raggedy Ann. She was a stuffed rabbit, with a cloth body bearing arms and legs like a human and long, cloth rabbit ears that stood up and a plastic, smiling rabbit face. Raggedy Ann was the first doll I ever asked for. I don’t know how I knew about her…probably from cartoon-time commercials. But I asked for one.
My dad bought this stuffed rabbit and, handing it to me, said, “Here’s Raggedy Ann." Mom later told me that he saw the Raggedy Ann doll in the store, but that it was so ugly, he couldn’t bring himself to buy one. Hence, Raggedy BoomBoom became my closest companion. She went with me everywhere, slept with me, told me stories. She could fly, loved to dance, hated Brussel’s Sprouts, kept me company in the back seat on road trips, and knew the best way to climb trees. Raggedy BoomBoom was so loved that my mother re-covered her in new material three times over the years to give her a fresh, sassy demeanor.
Then came Chatty Cathy, not as beloved as Raggedy BoomBoom, but interesting because she had a cord that, when pulled, caused her to say one of maybe six different phrases. Her voice box quickly broke, consigning her to a life of muteness in the bottom of the toy box.
Sometime in the mid ‘60s, I was given a Barbie doll. She came wearing a zebra-striped bathing suit and had a blond bubble hair-do. She also had breasts, an hour-glass figure and feet permanently shaped to wear high heels. Barbie was a huge departure from the baby dolls of the past. Now, instead of dolls urging me to pretend I was a mother, I had a doll urging me to play out grown-up roles. The switch here was huge. Of course, I still had Raggedy BoomBoom. I never saw myself as Raggedy BoomBoom’s mother. She was more of a peer…someone I looked up to and admired, someone who knew all the secrets I could never utter to anyone else.
Barbie became a conduit for acting out the way I viewed adults. Looking back, I can see now that Barbie was cruel. She had a malignant rage that she could point at anyone who crossed her. She spent all of her energy trying to catch people doing something wrong. She loved to direct this rage at children, who were always doing something wrong, something that needed shaming and correcting. I hadn’t thought about this until now, and it says some startling things about my world view as a child. I saw adults this way. My mother, one of my uncles, the biddies at church inclined me into a mind-set that was always trying and failing to be good.
My mother found some Simplicity patterns for Barbie clothes and made all kinds of dresses from scraps of cloth. I had the best dressed Barbie. I still have these dresses, all in 1950s style, fitted at the top, skirt flaring out. I had satin ball gowns with carefully stitched beading, a wedding dress, even a crochet night gown. This was before Mattel started marketing clothing lines for Barbie. I always thought that the things my mother made were way better.
Barbie had her own house and car. To me, Ken was always her boyfriend, never her husband. One of the TV shows at the time was That Girl, played by Marlo Thomas. That Girl was the first show of a woman, living in her own apartment in New York, building a career, dating a boyfriend. More than anyone else on TV, I wanted to be That Girl. She was an aspiring fashion model…an appropriate career for a woman at that time. But I, along with all of my girlfriends knew what we wanted to be. We all wanted to be airline stewardesses. The idea of flying all over the world for work was so romantic. At that time, you had to be extremely groomed and polished, beautiful as a fashion model. To be an airline stewardess was to be part of a very exclusive group of women. Your every effort needed to be geared toward being attractive to men. Someone like Barbie.
Eventually, I had a stack of Mattel dolls…Barbie, Ken, Skipper, Midge. Skipper was pre-adolescent. She had waist-long blond hair with bangs, a flat chest and legs that could bend at the knee. She wasn’t supposed to be Barbie’s child…just a sort of add on. When I was ten, Skipper was my favorite. I remember getting into trouble for taking her to school with me in the fifth grade. Then Midge came along, a less attractive side-kick of Skipper’s with freckles, brown hair and eyes and pig tails. Maybe Mattel decided to do something for the less attractive girls. Or maybe she was supposed to be a tomboy. We can’t all be blond princesses. I don’t remember how she was marketed, but she joined my Barbie family.
They all lived in the Barbie dream house, made of cardboard. It had a kitchen, living room and bedroom. Barbie never needed the toilet. The house came with cardboard furniture, which I could arrange in different ways and also came with a car. I thought the dream house was so cool, and I kept it like a museum piece, not wanting it to get worn or broken. I would bring out the dream house only when friends and company came over with their dolls. My dad eventually gave the dream house to my cousin Gail because he never saw me playing with it.
Dad gave a lot of my toys, which I realize now were never really mine, to my cousin, Gail. My bicycle, my desk…things would disappear and show up at my cousin’s house. He cited lack of gratitude as the reason for doing this. I never did figure out how to show sufficient gratitude to prevent things from vanishing. Now, I recognize what a power trip it all was. The dad giveth and the dad taketh away. But I managed to hang on to my Barbie dolls (I refer to the whole bunch as Barbie dolls). At my Aunt Janet’s urging, after my mother died, the Barbie dolls and clothes were one of the few things I stole from my mother’s house, along with a few family photos, my mother’s Bible and her cook book.
Through all the decades and all the loss, I wish I knew what happened to Raggedy BoomBoom.
I recently listened to an interview with Ed Snowden, who hadn’t fallen under my radar before. I think the interview was an old one because it appeared to take place when Trump was running in the 2016 election. Makes sense, because Snowden entered the limelight in 2013. The picture Snowden paints is grim, indeed. According to him, everything we do, all of the meta data generated by any and all of our electronic devices is captured and saved forever. So, we have no privacy. We have no security. We have no control over how information regarding our activities is used or who can see it. It’s all out there, according to Snowden, and agencies like the NSA don’t need a reason to pull any one of us onto their screen and review where we’ve been going, to whom we’ve been speaking, what we’ve been buying, what web sites we visit, where our social media sweet spots reside.
Naturally, I find this very disturbing, as anyone would. But, in my case, these contentions raise lots of questions. You see, I just retired from a career as a Systems Administrator. My title was Systems Engineer, but I wasn’t an Engineer. I didn’t create the software and had a very small role in designing the systems I maintained. I administered a virtual environment that supported about a dozen applications at a major wireless carrier.
One such application was LIMD. The LI stands for Lawful Intercept. The software is used by the carrier to work with law enforcement agencies, when they need to surveil a subject. Such activity requires a refined subject matter expert, and the carrier had one. A single guy was in charge of the systems set up to grant access to an individual’s cell phone activities. This was not used to obtain phone records, but to perform live, real-time surveillance of an individual’s activities. The law enforcement agency had to jump through numerous hoops before it could obtain this access. Mostly, it needed a warrant, granted by a duly authorized federal judge.
The subject matter expert of this system as a quintessential computer geek. He knew his systems, inside and out. His system consisted of a single two-server cluster. My end of it was outside of his realm. I administered LIMD, which interfaced with the SME’s environment. I was in charge of installing the LIMD software into my virtual environment, performing upgrades, tweaking things at the vendor’s advice. The software was a logistical nightmare because it was provided by a 3rd party vendor of the carrier’s 3rd party vendor. So, for me to get support, I had to go to the carrier’s vendor, and they didn’t know nuttin. I wasn’t allowed to go to their vendor, the company that manufactures the software. So, supporting it was like traveling through a mousetrap. When something didn’t work in the carrier’s environment the same way it did in the vendor’s lab, I was met with incredulity and skepticism. This is nothing new. This is how things work all over. But between the vendor spaghetti tangle and the carrier’s own network and system problems, we had to find ways around this mess.
One example…the software didn’t work in the carrier’s side because one of the servers in that two-node cluster I mentioned earlier was an ancient Sun Solaris box that was so old, it couldn’t support IPv6. So, the application couldn’t be configured to work within his cluster. The SME had to disable his cluster and route all of the traffic to a single node in order to get the thing to talk to the LIMD software. It took the guy 9 months to get the carrier to provide him with a second server that could support IPv6 so that he could restore the cluster and ensure redundancy. Dozens of things like this went on, each, in its own way, taking this highly sensitive system further and further away from being secure.
The time that I spent, personally, trying to get this thing to work was astounding, starting with the documentation. The carrier’s 3rd party vendor’s 3rd party vendor provided a document with every step and requirement for installation. The carrier’s 3rd party vendor would, then, translate the document into Korean. Then, in order to deliver the documentation to me, would translate it from Korean back into English. It was more questionable than the accuracy of the King James Bible. Nothing about this thing was easy.
I am writing all of this to refresh my own memory, even as I struggle to banish it from my mind. I retired a few months ago, and everything is fading fast, now that Linux, VMWare, Docker, Ansible and hundreds of other things are not part of my daily focus. I was the queen of finding a way through with things that had layers of blockage. But LIMD was my nemesis. Technical issues, network configuration nuances, arrogant men, language barriers, clueless project managers and an administration profile that incorporated a dozen diverse teams, each with its own interest or lack thereof, all contributed to the administration of the LIMD application. We were able to get it working in the lab for short periods of time. Each time we got it to chug along, the vender’s vendor would submit an upgrade. The upgrade in the works when I retired didn’t even resemble it’s prior incarnation, and the carrier finally surrendered to the reality that LIMD was never going to be delivered to Production. By the time I left, no one in the carrier’s organization expected me to get it working. I went on to other things. And, whenever the vendor announced some activity related to LIMD, the response from the carrier was: Yeah. Right. Sure. Whatever.
So, all of this brings me back to Snowden. Is LIMD a farce? Why would it be needed if anyone in the government or even within a given company can access all of our activities? We all know that there is no deleting anything from the internet. Once it’s out there, it stays out there. There’s always another hundred copies. Things get cached and routed and recycled. But Snowden implies that there is some mother of a database out there with all of our activities preserved…forever. He mentioned Google Chrome as an example of something that saves every search, every click forever. He talked about outsiders having the ability to access our cameras and microphones on our computers and phones without us being aware. I just don’t see how these things are possible. The carrier I worked for saved all SMS messages for 7 years, specifically to fulfill some government mandate. That’s all of the texts. It’s impossible to begin to image how much data that is.
Undoubtedly, some could read this and think me extremely naïve. But mine is a slightly informed naivety. I have questions, and I am capable of understanding the answers. Snowden presents as an intensely brilliant mind. His responses in the interview always answered the questions directly, without clouding or sugar-coating. The interview was fascinating and engaging. His technical explanations were clear and digestible. But I couldn’t listen to them without LIMD smirking in the back of my mind over everything he said. What Snowden was saying means that I turned myself into a contortionist during the last years of my employment over a carefully crafted arrangement of smoke and mirrors, designed to make us all think that there is a system in place to protect privacy.
According to Wikipedia’s article about Lawful Intercept:
To ensure the quality of evidence, the Commission on Accreditation for Law Enforcement Agencies (CALEA) has outlined standards for electronic surveillance once a Title III surveillance application is approved:
Generic global standards have also been developed by Cisco via the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) that provide a front-end means of supporting most LI real-time handover standards. All of these standards have been challenged as "deficient" by the U.S. Department of Justice pursuant to CALEA.
Is all of this just a huge steaming pile of bullshit? I don’t know how much more energy I want to give this topic. I see it as a potential rabbit hole. And I’m not convinced, but now I am wary.